BI-RADS 4类乳腺病变的实时剪切波弹性成像和超声造影比较研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

南京医科大学第一附属医院,南京医科大学第一附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparing the diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the BI-RADS 4 breast lesions
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较实时剪切波弹性成像(shear-wave elastography,SWE)和超声造影(contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, CEUS)在乳腺BI-RADS 4类病变中的诊断价值。方法 对70例女性患者共72个乳腺病变进行SWE检查,测量最大弹性模量值Emax;进行CEUS检查,运用CEUS 5分法对病灶评分。以手术病理结果为诊断金标准,构建受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC)并比较两种方法的诊断效能。结合BI-RADS亚分类比较诊断准确性。结果 通过绘制ROC曲线,Emax及CEUS评分对诊断BI-RADS 4类乳腺病变的AUC分别为0.840、0.754,两者无统计学差异(P >0.05)。对于4A类病变,SWE诊断准确性(93.9%)高于CEUS(75.7%)(P<0.05)。而对于BI-RADS 4B及4C类结节,SWE与CEUS的准确性无明显统计学差异(P >0.05)。结论 SWE和CEUS在乳腺BI-RADS 4类病变的良恶性鉴别诊断中有较高的诊断价值,且价值相当,与BI-RADS分类相结合可以优化检查方法。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography(SWE) and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS) in differentiating the BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. Methods 70 patients with 72 lesions were examined with SWE and CEUS respectively. Maximum elasticity (Emax) and CEUS 5-point scores were assessed. The results were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). To combine with BI-RADS, the accuracy of Emax and CEUS 5-point scores were compared. Results The AUC of Emax and CEUS 5-point scores were 0.840、0.754. No significant difference was noted. The accuracy of Emax(93.9%) was higher than that of CEUS 5-point scores(75.7%)in 4A lesions(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in accuracy among other categories. Conclusions Both SWE and CEUS were helpful for the differentiation the BI-RADS 4 breast lesions , and the diagnostic performance of SWE and CEUS was similar.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

彭晓静,袁涛. BI-RADS 4类乳腺病变的实时剪切波弹性成像和超声造影比较研究[J].临床超声医学杂志,2017,19(8):510-513

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-19
  • 最后修改日期:2017-07-16
  • 录用日期:2017-01-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-09-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码

扫码关注

官方微信