肝脏影像报告和数据管理系统超声造影分类标准对 肝细胞癌的诊断价值
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院超声诊断科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(81671701)


Diagnostic efficacy of liver imaging reporting and data system for hepatocellular carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound
Author:
Affiliation:

Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨肝脏影像报告和数据管理系统(LI-RADS)超声造影分类标准诊断肝细胞癌的诊断效能。方法 选取具有肝细胞癌高危因素的肝脏局灶性病变患者129例(共148个病灶),均行超声造影检查,以病理组织学诊断或最终临床诊断为标准,计算LI-RADS标准诊断HCC的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值及阴性预测值;绘制受试者工作特征曲线并计算其曲线下面积。结果 LR-1类和LR-2类病灶35个,LR-3、LR-4、LR-5类病灶76个(LR-3类9个,LR-4类24个,LR-5类43个),LR-M类病灶37个。LR-1类和LR-2类病灶临床诊断均为良性;LR-3、LR-4、LR-5类病灶中,67个为肝细胞癌;LR-M类病灶中,1个为肝细胞癌。将LR-1和 LR-2类归为阴性,LR-3、LR-4、LR-5类归为阳性或LR-4、LR-5类归为阳性,其诊断肝细胞癌的敏感性分别为100%、100%,特异性分别为79.5%、87.5%,阳性预测值为88.2%、92.5%;曲线下面积分别为0.949和0.952。结论 LI-RADS分类标准为超声造影的标准化评估和规范报告提供了参考标准,对肝细胞癌具有较好的诊断效能。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the utility of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2016 for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Methods 129 patients (148 nodules) at risk with HCC were included in this study. All patients were examined by convention ultrasound and CEUS, the images were reviewed according to the LI-RADS categorization. Results were compared to histology and/or clinical diagnosis as reference standards. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the area under the ROC curve in the diagnosis of HCC with the LI-RADS categorization were calculated. Results 35 nodules were initially assigned as LR-1 or LR-2, 9 nodules were initially assigned as LR-3, 24 nodules were initially assigned as LR4, 43nodules were initially assigned as LR-5, 37 nodules were initially assigned as LR-M. 35 nodules in category 1 or 2 were benign nodules proved by clinical diagnosis. Of 76 nodules in category LR-3~5, there were 67 HCCs. Of 37 nodules in category LR-M, there was 1 HCC. If LR1 and LR2 were considered negative, and LR-3, 4, 5 were positive, then the sensitivity, the specificity and the PPV was 100%, 79.5% and 88.2%,respectively. If LR-1 and LR-2 were considered negative and LR-4, 5 were positive, the sensitivity, the specificity and the PPV was 100%, 87.5% and 92.5%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve were 0.949 and 0.952 respectively. Conclusions LI-RADS-CEUS offers a CEUS algorithm for standardized assessment and reporting of liver nodules in patients at risk with HCC,it is demonstrated as a valuable tool for the diagnosis of HCC.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

韩浩.肝脏影像报告和数据管理系统超声造影分类标准对 肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J].临床超声医学杂志,2017,19(8):505-509

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-11
  • 最后修改日期:2017-07-16
  • 录用日期:2017-02-27
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-09-19
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码

扫码关注

官方微信