主动脉夹层经胸超声心动图漏诊及误诊原因分析
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者单位:400042 重庆,陆军军医大学大坪医院超声科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of aortic dissection through transthoracic echocardiography
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    摘要:目的:探讨主动脉夹层超声表现及部分病例漏诊误诊原因。方法:收集经手术证实为主动脉夹层诊断的病例50例进行回顾分析。结果:手术证实升主动脉夹层36处,主动脉弓夹层29处,降主动脉夹层43处。超声心动图对降主动脉病变漏诊16处,对主动脉弓病变漏诊9处,对升主动脉处病变漏诊1处。漏诊导致对主动脉夹层Debakey分型错误,I型夹层误诊16例,II型夹层误诊0例,III型夹层误诊1例。结论:主动脉夹层漏诊数量由高至低依次为降主动脉、主动脉弓、升主动脉,漏诊及误诊与超声医师因素、超声图像及设备因素密切相关。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To investigate the ultrasound findings of aortic dissection and its causes of misdiagnosis and miss-diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 50 cases of aortic dissection confirmed by surgery or autopsy. Results: Totally 36 ascending aortic dissections, 29 aortic arch dissections, and 43 descending aortic dissections were confirmed by surgery. Echocardiography missed 16 of the descending aortic lesions, 9 of the aortic arch lesions, and 1 of the ascending aortic lesions. Misdiagnosis resulted in incorrect Debakey typing of the aortic dissection. Among them, 16 cases were misdiagnosed with type I dissection and 1 case was misdiagnosed with type III dissection. ?Conclusion: The number of missed diagnosis of aortic dissection is descending aorta, aortic arch, and ascending aorta in order from high to low. The misdiagnosis and miss-diagnosisof aortic dissection may be related to the experienceof sonographer, ultrasound image and ultrasound equipment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

阳建政,李嘉怡,薛向花,田猛,杜文华,李陶.主动脉夹层经胸超声心动图漏诊及误诊原因分析[J].临床超声医学杂志,2020,22(7):

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-31
  • 最后修改日期:2019-11-27
  • 录用日期:2019-12-02
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-07-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码

扫码关注

官方微信