早孕期超声观察 “叠线”征在胎儿腭裂筛查中的临床研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

成都市第一人民医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

四川省卫生健康委员会科研课题(20PJ189)


The Utility of the Ultrasound " Superimposed-Line" Sign in First Trimester Screening for Fetal Cleft Palate
Author:
Affiliation:

Chengdu First People’s Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评价早孕期(11~13+6周)超声观察犁骨与上颌骨结合处形成的“叠线”征在胎儿腭裂筛查中的临床价值。 方法 回顾性分析经产后或引产后证实为腭裂的45例胎儿(病例组)和4500例经产后证实为正常胎儿(对照组)的早孕期(11~13+6周)颈项透明层检查的面部正中矢状面声像图,观察和记录犁骨与上颌骨结合处所形成的“叠线”征声像表现,并进行组间比较分析。 结果 45例病例组胎儿中“叠线”征缺失39例(86.67%,39/45),其中单纯继发腭硬腭裂4例(8.89%,4/45),继发腭硬腭裂合并原发腭裂35例(77.78%,35/45); “叠线”征存在6例(13.33%,6/45),其中单纯软腭裂2例(4.44%,2/45),单纯悬雍垂裂1例(2.22%,1/45),单纯原发腭裂3例(6.67%,3/45);4500例对照组胎儿中“叠线”征存在4469例(99.31%,4469/4500),“叠线”征缺失31例(0.69%,31/4500)。组间胎儿“叠线”征存在与否情况比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。运用“叠线”征缺失预测胎儿腭裂的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别是86.67%(39/45), 99.31%(4469/4500), 55.71%(39/70), 99.86%(4469/4475)。 结论 继发腭硬腭裂合并或不合并原发腭裂表现为“叠线”征缺失,单纯原发腭裂、单纯软腭裂、单纯悬雍垂裂和正常胎儿“叠线”征存在。早孕期胎儿面部正中矢状面上“叠线”征缺失在胎儿腭裂尤其是继发腭硬腭裂筛查中有重要价值。

    Abstract:

    Objective: The current study evaluates the diagnostic value of screening for a fetal cleft palate by using the ultrasound-based observation of the "superimposed-line" sign appearing at the junction of the vomer and maxilla in the first trimester of pregnancy. Methods: Retrospective analyses were performed of ultrasonographic images of nuchal translucency (NT) obtained during the first trimester of pregnancy (11–13+6 weeks) from 45 fetuses with a cleft palate later confirmed following parturition or induced labor (cases) and 4500 normal fetuses confirmed after parturition (controls). Ultrasonographic features of the "superimposed-line" sign were observed and recorded, and between-group comparisons were performed. Results: The "superimposed-line" sign was absent in 39 cases (86.67%), including 4 (8.89%) with simple secondary hard palate cleft and 35 (77.78%) with secondary hard palate cleft complicated by a primary cleft palate. 6 cases showed the "superimposed-line" sign (13.33%), including 2 (4.44%) with a simple secondary soft palate cleft, 1 (2.22%) with a simple secondary bifid uvula, and 3 (6.67%) with a simple primary cleft palate. Among the 4500 controls, 4469 fetuses showed the "superimposed-line" sign (99.31%) and 31 fetuses showed an absence of the "superimposed-line" sign (0.69%). The between-group difference was significant (p<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of the "superimposed-line" sign in the first trimester of pregnancy for predicting fetal cleft palate were 86.67%(39/45), 99.31%(4469/4500), 55.71%(39/70), and 99.86%(4469/4475), respectively. Conclusion: The "superimposed-line" sign did not appear in fetuses with secondary hard palate cleft and primary cleft palate only when a secondary hard palate cleft is present. The sign appeared in normal fetuses and those with a simple primary cleft palate, simple secondary soft palate cleft, or with a simple secondary bifid uvula. Based on these results, we propose that the "superimposed-line" sign in the mid-sagittal plane of the fetal face in the first trimester of pregnancy is an important tool in screening for fetal cleft palate, especially secondary hard palate cleft.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

胡丽蓉,罗瑜,冯梦娟.早孕期超声观察 “叠线”征在胎儿腭裂筛查中的临床研究[J].临床超声医学杂志,2023,25(2):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-08
  • 最后修改日期:2022-09-19
  • 录用日期:2022-10-10
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-03-06
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码

扫码关注

官方微信