超声弹性成像弹性评分及应变率比值在三阴性乳腺癌诊断中的应用 及其与微血管密度的关系
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.辽宁省大连市 大连大学附属中山医院 体检中心超声科;2.广东医科大学附属茶山医院超声科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Application of elasticity score and strain ratio in the diagnosis of triple negative breast cancer and their relationship with microvascular density
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 分析超声弹性成像弹性评分及应变率比值(SR)在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)诊断中的应用及其与微血管密度(MVD)的关系。方法 回顾性收集2021年1月~2023年12月我院收治的150例乳腺癌患者,根据手术病理结果进行分组,分为TNBC组(29例)和非TNBC组(121例)。比较两组患者基线资料、UE弹性评分、SR及MVD,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以曲线下面积(AUC)评估UE弹性评分、SR对TNBC的诊断效能。使用Pearson法分析UE弹性评分、SR与TNBC患者MVD的关系。结果 TNBC组UE弹性评分、SR分别为(4.35±0.18)分、(3.57±0.28),非TNBC组分别为(4.19±0.13)分、(3.36±0.15),TNBC组 UE弹性评分、SR均大于非TNBC组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。ROC曲线显示,UE弹性评分、SR诊断TNBC的AUC分别为0.791、0.734,二者联合诊断TNBC的AUC为0.877(95%CI:0.814~0.925),敏感度为75.86%,特异度为86.78%,联合诊断AUC 高于单独指标(Z=5.372、3.885,P=<0.001、<0.001)。TNBC组MVD为(46.75±11.23)个/mm2,非TNBC组为(39.28±10.05)个/mm2,TNBC组MVD大于非TNBC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Pearson法分析结果显示,UE弹性评分、SR与TNBC患者MVD呈明显正相关(P<0.05)。结论 UE弹性评分、SR可用于诊断TNBC,二者联合诊断有利于提高诊断准确性,且UE弹性评分、SR与MVD有显著相关性。

    Abstract:

    Abstract Objective To analyze the application of elasticity score and strain ratio (SR) in the diagnosis of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and their relationship with microvessel density (MVD). Methods A total of 150 patients with breast cancer admitted to the hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 were reviewed. They were divided into TNBC group (29 cases) and non-TNBC group (121 cases) according to the surgical and pathological results. Baseline data, UE elasticity score, SR, and MVD were compared between the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of UE elasticity score and SR in TNBC. Pearson method was used to analyze the relationship between UE elasticity score, SR and MVD in patients with TNBC. Results UE elasticity score and SR of the TNBC group [(4.35±0.18) and (3.57±0.28)] were higher than those of the non-TNBC group [(4.19±0.13) and (3.36±0.15)] (P<0.05). ROC curves indicated that the AUC values of UE elasticity score and SR for diagnosing TNBC were 0.791 and 0.734. The AUC of combination of the two for diagnosing TNBC was 0.877 (95% CI: 0.814-0.925). The sensitivity and specificity were 75.86% and 86.78%. The AUC of combined diagnosis was higher than that of diagnosis using a single indicator (Z=5.372, 3.885, P=<0.001, <0.001). MVD of the TNBC group [(46.75±11.23)/mm2] was high than that of the non-TNBC group [(39.28±10.05)/mm2] (P<0.05). Pearson analysis results showed that UE elasticity score and SR were positively correlated with MVD in patients with TNBC. Conclusion UE elasticity score and SR can be used for diagnosing TNBC. Combined diagnosis with the two is beneficial for improving diagnostic accuracy. In addition, there is a significant correlation between UE elasticity score, SR and MVD.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王蓉,刘瑜,杨广祥,贾罗好.超声弹性成像弹性评分及应变率比值在三阴性乳腺癌诊断中的应用 及其与微血管密度的关系[J].临床超声医学杂志,2025,27(3):

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-01
  • 最后修改日期:2024-09-02
  • 录用日期:2024-09-20
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-04-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码

扫码关注

官方微信